
The Federal High Court in Lagos has discharged former Ekiti State Governor Ayodele Fayose of charges bordering on money laundering and theft amounting to ₦6.9 billion.
Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke ruled in favor of Fayose’s no-case submission, stating that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) failed to establish a prima facie case against him.
Fayose was first arraigned in 2018 before Justice Mojisola Olatoregun, but the EFCC later secured a transfer of the case to Justice Aneke. The case has been ongoing for several years, with the EFCC presenting its case and Fayose defending himself.
The EFCC accused Fayose of receiving ₦1.2 billion for his 2014 governorship campaign and collecting $5 million in cash from former Minister of State for Defence Musiliu Obanikoro without going through financial institutions. The anti-graft agency alleged that Fayose laundered various sums, retained, and used over ₦1.6 billion to acquire properties through proxies and companies.
Justice Aneke upheld Fayose’s no-case submission, ruling that the EFCC failed to link him to the alleged crime or establish a prima facie case. The judge held that the prosecution’s evidence did not implicate Fayose in the alleged offenses.
The ruling means Fayose has no case to answer, and the charges against him have been struck out.
The court’s decision brings to an end a long-running legal battle between Fayose and the EFCC.
Fayose’s supporters and lawyers were present in court when the ruling was delivered. They expressed relief and satisfaction with the court’s decision, saying it was a vindication of Fayose’s innocence.
The EFCC may choose to appeal the court’s decision. However, for now, the ruling stands, and Fayose has been discharged.
The court’s decision is a significant victory for Fayose, who has maintained his innocence throughout the trial.
The ruling is a testament to the strength of the judicial system in Nigeria.
The court’s decision is based on the evidence presented by the prosecution.
The judge held that the prosecution failed to provide sufficient evidence to link Fayose to the alleged crime.
The case highlights the importance of evidence in proving guilt or innocence. The prosecution’s failure to provide sufficient evidence meant that Fayose had no case to answer.
The case serves as a lesson for the EFCC to ensure that it has sufficient evidence before prosecuting individuals. The agency must be thorough in its investigations to avoid cases like this.
The judiciary plays a crucial role in ensuring that justice is served. In this case, the court upheld the law and discharged Fayose based on the evidence presented.
Fayose’s future plans are not affected by the court’s decision. He can now focus on his personal and political life without the burden of the charges.
EFCC’s mandate is to investigate and prosecute financial crimes. However, the agency must do so in accordance with the law and ensure that it has sufficient evidence before prosecuting individuals.
The court’s decision marks a new chapter in Fayose’s life. He can now move on from the ordeal and focus on his future plans.
The court’s decision to discharge Fayose of the ₦6.9 billion money laundering charges is a significant victory for him. The ruling highlights the importance of evidence in proving guilt or innocence and serves as a lesson for the EFCC to ensure that it has sufficient evidence before prosecuting individuals.
The court’s decision marks the end of a chapter in Fayose’s life. He can now move on from the ordeal and focus on his future plans.
The case serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding the law and ensuring that justice is served. The court’s decision is a significant milestone in Fayose’s life, and he can now move on from the ordeal.

